Archive | November, 2015

“Pharmacare is the unfinished business of Canadian Medicare”

Posted on 23 November 2015 by Jessica Bryce

“Pharmacare is the unfinished business of Canadian Medicare” says a new report by Pharmacare 2020, an organization comprised of a number of prominent physicians, health policy workers, and researchers.

How did we get here? Why are prescription drugs not covered by Canadian medicare? Why don’t we need to show our health card when we go to the pharmacy? To answer these questions, we must delve into the history of Canada’s health care system.

Since the early days of medicare, many have argued that medications are a necessary part of a comprehensive coverage system. In 1945, the Federal government made the first proposal to the provinces regarding a national medical insurance system that, notably, suggested inclusion of drug coverage. In 1964, the Royal Commission on Health Services (informally known as the Hall report), recommended that the federal government assist the provinces in establishing a comprehensive, universal program for ensuring medical services (which was based on Saskatchewan’s system that was already implemented). This influential report also recommended that the plan include coverage for prescription drugs. Drug coverage was discussed at the federal level, but “was shelved because the government did not perceive sufficient public demand to make it a political win” ( Thus, it was not included in the 1966 Medical Care Act, a precursor of the 1984 Canada Health Act. Without federal direction, each province formed its own public drug coverage insurance plan for specific sub-populations. Most of these programs target seniors, low income families, and individuals with disabilities.

The idea of universal pharmaceutical coverage was not formally revisited at the federal level until 1997, when former Prime Minister Jean Chretien chaired the ‘National Forum on Health’. The forum identified two key problems with drug benefit plans:

  1. Having multiple bodies purchase drugs (i.e. private insurance companies, hospitals, provincial drug plans) reduced the purchasing power that could be had by a larger collective organization
  2. Seniors were under-insured for many necessary medications

Yet again, it was recommended that drugs should be included “because pharmaceuticals are medically necessary and public financing is the only reasonable way to promote universal access and to control costs.” (National Forum on Health 1997). In 2002, the Romanow commission recommended starting with federally-initiated catastrophic drug coverage. Then, incremental reforms could ultimately lead to complete drug coverage for all Canadians. This report lead to the formation of the National Pharmaceuticals Strategy in 2004. Unfortunately, funding decreased and progress was hindered due a change in the federal government in 2006.

Although not government sanctioned, a number of reports since 2002 have recommended a Universal Pharmacare Coverage program. However, a quick glance at the authors of these reports demonstrates considerable overlap. Although well written and researched, there are a limited number of groups and individuals researching potential pharmacare reforms in Canada, and even less ambassadors for it at the provincial and federal government level. However, as pointed out in the recent Pharmacare 2020 report ‘The Future of Drug Coverage in Canada’: “a July 2015 poll by the Angus Reid Institute found that 91% of Canadians support the concept of having “Pharmacare” to provide universal access to necessary medicines; 88% believe that medicines should be part of Medicare; 80% believe that a single-payer system would be more efficient; and 89% believe Pharmacare should be a joint effort involving provinces and the federal government.” Public demand for pharmacare reform is there, the research supports it, and yet there are no government initiatives and virtually no incentive for the government to do so. What should be done?

….. stay tuned for more!



  1. Are Income-Based Public Drug Benefit Programs Fit for an Aging Population?
  2. Pharmacare 2020: The Future of Drug Coverage in Canada
  3. 2014 Lobby Day Delegate Backgrounder

Comments Off on “Pharmacare is the unfinished business of Canadian Medicare”

Tags: , , ,

What’s Stand Up for Health?

Posted on 01 November 2015 by Amanda Sauve

What’s Stand Up for Health & Why is it in our curriculum?

Health Canada recognizes 14 determinants that influence the health of Canadians including income, education, employment status, race, and gender identity, to name a few. As a student body we are familiar with social determinants of health, but often find learning their relevance in the classroom to be didactic and to put it bluntly, boring. A practical way to help students learn about these important issues is “Stand Up for Health,” an immersive simulation that gives participants a better understanding and appreciation of the social determinants of health. During the simulation participants are placed in the role of low income Canadians and must interact, make choices, and solve challenges within their given set of social circumstances. This provides students with exposure to some of the tough decisions made everyday by Canadians, and offers an opportunity for us to see through their perspective. The objective is to help us better develop the skills to empathize with patients, to identify healthcare limitations, and start conversations on how we can advocate for improved healthcare for all Canadians.

Stand Up for Health has recently gained recognition in medical education. It has been played at Ontario Medical Students’ Weekend (OMSW) 2014 & 2015 and the 2015 Canadian Federation of Medical Students (CFMS) Annual General Meeting in Windsor. Most recently, it has been integrated into undergraduate medical curricula at both Western and the University of Toronto. We’re hoping to permanently implement the simulation in our curriculum (for the 2020’s and beyond!)

If you (2018s or 2019s) would like more information or are interested in becoming a game facilitator (officially termed “change agent”), please contact Amanda Sauvé (


Comments Off on What’s Stand Up for Health?